Contemporary African art can in particular be easily generalized to a unique concept and reduces it to many art scenes throughout Africa, and each fueled by its own context parameters.
An indigenous African artist, and works at home lives, it is clear that the starting point, but what about those that go on excursions between two worlds? Or even those who have never set foot in Africa, but is their inheritance African and their work is inspired by and reflects this heritage?
And what about the white Africans that are from European equities one, two or three centuries before? They have to be as much entitled to addition than their black counterparts in the context?
Afropolitanism is the voguish term for new works by young African artists both in and outside Africa. They present their art in several exhibitions. The artists are probably united by a common vision of Africa but this seems grotesque given that their cultures are broadly varied, scattered their geographical locations, their personal stories and travel vastly different.
Image Source: Google
I, like Holland Cotter of The New York Times, do not choose an artist to properly wrap 'to defend their origin in the detection. Their work will show up to this point of creativity, a personal reflection, which has its defined and contributed to their mode of existence of everything.
Their Africanity 'contemporary African art, or can not be perceived or relevant to the subject, but it is inherent in their nature and their work.